There were two options, and both clubs preferred one alternative.
Spring Farewell – A Weighty Theme
Juventus was a potentially pivotal project in Tiago Motta’s career. The specialist made a name for himself as manager of Bologna and ultimately brought the “red and blue” to the Champions League. The “old signing” needed a mentor who would reboot the project, breathe new meaning into it, and shape a relevant period of philosophy. The result of the collaboration was the coach’s spring resignation. At the same time, it is now difficult to evaluate this period of work.
The club’s arguments are understandable. The Turinese are not used to the isolation of the championship race – and here, on top of that, the team failed to show a hint of substantial play. Moreover, Bianconeri received enough from Superiore in a short period of time. At the beginning of the season, Stuttgart suffered a defeat, followed by a draw with Lille in the next round. This was gradually compounded by defeats to Milan, Napoli, Benfica, and the departure of Ligue 1 champions League champions PSV. At the same time, the team had huge problems with its attacking style, which Mott failed to resolve (the club’s management was disappointed). On the other hand, all arguments are undermined by one fact: Turin must have known what they were getting into. In place of Allegri, they hired a specialist whose system had nothing to do with his predecessor’s philosophy. For Juve to play Motta’s football, it needed a global restructuring – numerous transfers (trial and error method), player devotion, trust and time. I felt a taste. Bologna is a wonderful project for a coach who only shapes his image. Mott showed confidence, began to bring the players to his demands, and they always sought reinforcements—even if that’s the point. But this project is still a small city. Juventus is a reach that young specialists can only dream of. The Turin players have enough money for players, so the mentor will have far fewer restrictions. On top of that, the name of the project plays into the hands of the specialist—they know much more about Juve, for a larger number of players, that team is already a quality brand. In general, fighting for football players is easier. Of course, I’m disappointed because everything went as poorly as we’d hoped, especially in the Coppa Italia and the Champions League. However, I don’t agree with the term failure: the work was interrupted when we were sitting at the same point from fourth place in the table, which at the beginning of the season was a priority objective. When I agreed to take on the role, he knew it would be a three-year project. Its foundation is profound changes and a radical rejuvenation. I know very well that in teams at Juve’s level, you have to win, especially after several years in which that hasn’t happened. Atalanta was the last hopeWhen the clubs finished the season, two candidates came to Motta: Milan and Atalanta. As for the former, the Rossoneri are continuing their attempts to restart the project. Pioly didn’t establish a long-term collaboration, and a clear transition to a new specialist proved to be a mistake. The appointment of Fonseca proved to be a failure, and they also failed to achieve harmony with Conseisau. Milan remained in the same position as last year.
The Bergamos had a different situation—they were just beginning their restructuring. The club ended with a grand era under Jan Pierrot Gasperini. The coach even led the team from a modest city to a Europa League victory—and has likely already become a legend among the fans. At the same time, phenomenal fatigue has likely built up from the collaboration. So now, everything has to start from scratch.
Unfortunately for Motta, Milan ultimately preferred Allegri; Massimiliano had already coached the team. Atalanta appointed Ivan Yurich. Here, the choice is even less clear; Ivan’s background is much more modest, and when a specialist was given a chance at Roma, he failed. For the Bergamo team, continuity has become more important—Yurich plays the same system and promotes the same principles as Gasperini. His goal allows for minimal changes.
There will always be a dilemma facing clubs.
It seems that Tiago has grown up in the middle of the league, and the best clubs have preferred other specialists. But when choosing a project, there will always be certain restrictions. First of all, due to a specific style. Clubs, as practice shows, try to make minimal changes to save money (Manchester United
Mu
And
Paris Sen-Zhermen
PSG
don’t count). But to do this, tactical integrity must be maintained, while the manager has a rather specific style. He can be a suitable replacement for few—and few can be an alternative to him. For Bologna, the quality the coach provided was more expensive; he was trusted. There won’t be anything like that with the others. Especially after a contradictory performance at Juventus, which raises some doubts, Mott will have to be quite picky when looking for a job.
Motte
Motte
Source link
About the Author
