The Russian Football Union’s Expert Committee on Swimming reviewed the appeal in the matches of the 30th round of the Russian Premier League and the Butt games. Russian Premier League 30th Round, Dynamo (Makhachkala) – Rostov (Rostov-on-Don), referee Pavel Kukoyan Time on the appeal by Dynamo Makhachkala and the Control and Disciplinary Committee
RFUTime on the clock:
58th minute. To review the referee’s decision to remove Dynamo from the Dynamo field.
The Commission’s decision:The referee correctly removed the Dynamo football pitch from the Egash field. Vote: Unanimously.
Reason: Egash Kacinths used excessive force in a ball-fight with Andrei Langovich (“Rostov”), attacking intensively with an open foot against the opponent’s leg. Egash Kacinth is guilty of a serious violation of the rules of the game, as his actions threatened the opponent’s safety. The first transitional match for a place in theRussian Premier League
RPLSochi (Sochi) – Paris Saint-Germain (Nizhny Novgorod), referee Sergey Karasev
The time of the appeal by Sochi and the Control and Disciplinary CommitteeRussian Football League
RFUTime on the clock:
38th minute. Review the referee’s decision to remove Sochi player Vladimir Pisarsky from the field. The Commission’s decision:The judge correctly removed Sochi team player Vladimir Pisarsky from the field.
Unanimously.
Reason
Vladimir Pisarsky used excessive force in a ball-fighting match with Paris Saint-Germain player Alexander Ektov, making contact at high speed with an open foot on the opponent’s lower leg. Vladimir Pisarsky is guilty of a serious violation of the rules of the game, as his actions endangered the opponent’s safety.The second transitional match for a place in the
Russian Premier LeagueRPL
“Akhmat” (Grozny) – “Ural” (Yekaterinburg), referee – Sergey IvanovThe moment of “Ural”‘s call
Time on the clock:12th minute. The essence of the appeal:
Review the referee’s decision to cancel the Akhmat goal due to the offside position of Ural player Andrei Yegorychev. The referee wrongly canceled the goal ofFC
“Akhmat” football club due to the offside position of Andrei Yegorychev (“Ural”).
Vote:Unanimously.
Motivation:Andrei Yegorychev, being behind the offside line at the time of his teammate’s goal, did not affect the goalkeeper’s goal to play the ball (did not cut him off from the line of sight), nor did he affect a defender’s ability to play the ball. After the ball came off the goalpost, Timur Ayupov finished the ball into the goal from the correct position. The goal must be counted.
Episode of the appeal of “Urals”Time on the clock: The essence of the appeal: Review the referee’s decision not to record a rules violation by Akhmat’s player Georgy Melkadze against Ural’s player Yegor Filippenko before recording the penalty.
The Commission’s decision:The referee did not record a rules violation by George Melkadze (Akhmat) against Yegor Filippenko (“Ural”) before the penalty.
Vote:Unanimously.
Motivation: George Melkadze was focused on the ball during the jump. His hands moved naturally in this action. There was no additional hand movement towards Yegor Filippenko, who invaded his space from the back and initiated contact with the opponent’s hand. In the next phase of the penalty attack, Silvoy Begich was correctly adjudged for violating the rules of the Ural defender against Akhmat Mohammed Talal.
Source link
