Secretary General RFU Maxim Mitrofanov spoke about the decision to disqualify Sochi striker Vladimir Pisarsky.
The Ethics Committee did everything objectively. They issued a fairly detailed press release explaining their decision. It seems to me that no one doubts the objectiveness of the decision. They took into account the fact that the football player repented and cooperated. Let’s move on. Instead of a standard five-year sentence, a fairly fair decision was made. But the issue of incitement or control-disciplinary comedy in terms of attempts to illegally influence the outcome of the match has not yet been addressed. Many have written that his lack of guilt would have been established. This is not the case; it is the competence of
control-disciplinary comedy . After gathering the necessary evidence, we will consider the issue. In what situation could the Pisars affair affect the integrity of the following seasonRussian Premier League
RPL Russian Football LeagueRFU How could a bookmaker provide information about Pisars’ personal transfers? Not a question for us. We asked the football player, and he immediately confirmed. His teammate also revealed everything. Source link